• 0 Posts
  • 34 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle



  • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.worldtomemes@lemmy.world90s
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    29 days ago

    I wasn’t alive in the 70s, but I remember seeing them a bunch when I was a kid in the 80s. A lot of the time they were in cans labeled “peanut brittle,” which I always thought was weird because to this day I have never once seen actual peanut brittle packaged in a can.




  • If it makes you feel any better, a lot of the time those posts aren’t even made by real people. They’re made by bots who are designed to post something completely wrong or wildly contrary for the sole purpose of pissing you off so that you’ll engage and add to the post count.

    Or sometimes they’re more malicious like the shit-disturber bots that BlueSky was (or maybe still is) plagued with that inject what-about-isms and negativity into otherwise healthy and productive conversations just to poison the discourse and inject conservative bullshit into leftist spaces. Not that BlueSky is particularly leftist, but you’d see the bots appear more frequently in threads where people were talking positively about leftist ideas, or where the conversation was otherwise becoming too “woke.”

    So you might not actually be missing out on anything except arguing with a clanker who only cares about its prompt.


  • I don’t think it’s going to make much, if any, difference with synthetic fibers. It won’t hurt anything to try it and see what happens, but I’m pretty sure the idea of wearing wet clothes until they dry to get a better fit is a holdover from the days before pre-shrunk jeans were the norm. You used to have to buy jeans in a larger size with the expectation that they would shrink down to your size over the course of several washes. People used to put them on wet and wear them until they dried so that when that shrinkage happened it would conform to their body shape.

    If you want your leggings to remain as stretchy as possible for as long as possible probably the best thing would be to hang-dry them rather than putting them in the dryer. The heat from the dryer can cause elastic to wear out prematurely.





  • Saying you don’t like podcasts is like saying you don’t like music. There’s so many, made by so many people, in so many different ways, on so many subjects, that there’s bound to be at least a couple you think are amazing. I mean, if all podcasts were just a bunch of dude-bros having a verbal wank into a microphone once or twice a week, then yeah, miss me with that shit. But a lot of them put a lot of effort into producing a high quality professional sounding show. Some of my favorites are 99% Invisible, which is a very well made show about not so obvious features of architecture and design; One Song, where they break popular songs down into all the isolated tracks and talk about how it was all put together; This Podcast Will Kill You, where they do well researched histories of diseases and toxins, their discovery, treatment, social impacts, etc; and You Are Not So Smart, which is a podcast about psychology and sociology. Other people already mentioned Behind the Bastards and Darknet Diaries, which I also listen to regularly. Chances are that no matter what subjects or hobbies you have a deep interest in there’s at least one or two really well made podcasts about it.


  • “She got a sentence that was harsh. It was a 9 year sentence,” Polis said in March.

    It actually wasn’t harsh though. MAGA is just pretending like it was because they’re pissed that one of them had to face any kind of consequences for their criminal behavior. The maximum penalty allowed by statute for each count she was convicted on was double what she actually got. Despite her showing absolutely zero remorse or contrition, the judge still gave her half the sentence they could have.

    I can’t imagine why Polis would ever think pardoning her was a good idea, but I suspect he’s looking ahead to when he leaves office next year, and this is the beginning of his heel turn into becoming a right-wing grifter.



  • Can someone help me understand once and for all what an “assault style” weapon is?

    So, “assault rifle” is kind a colloquial term. It’s not an actual military category or designation as far as I know. But in a military context the type of gun that people commonly call an assault rifle is a type of light machine gun which shoots what’s called an “intermediate round.” That’s a smaller caliber or lower power rifle round that is spicier and has a longer range than the pistol rounds that sub-machine guns shoot, but which are less spicy and easier to control than the bigger .30 caliber rifle rounds that regular full size machine guns shoot. It sort of splits the difference between two types of weapon to hopefully be more effective in a broader range of circumstances. AR platform rifles like M-16s and M-4s shoot a spiced up .22 caliber rifle round (.223 Remington/5.56 NATO), and AK platform rifles shoot a toned down .30 caliber rifle round with a shortened casing (7.62X39mm aka 7.62 Soviet).

    The military version of these rifles are actual fully automatic machine guns, meaning that when on the full auto setting when you pull the trigger they will keep firing bullets until you let off the trigger again. That full-auto capability is pretty much the entire “assault” part of an assault rifle. And it’s kind of the difference between military rifles and any other rifle. And even though they look virtually identical, the civilian versions of the same rifles are not capable of doing that. They’re just regular semi-automatic rifles, which means they automatically re-cock themselves after each shot so you don’t have cycle the gun’s action manually, but each shot still requires a separate trigger pull. You can’t just spray bullets like an action movie. They work the same as any traditional wooden-stock semi-auto hunting rifle that you’d use for hunting deer or elk.

    What makes an assault style weapon more deadly than a non assault style weapon?

    They’re not. In terms of power and effective range they’re pretty thoroughly outclassed by your average deer rifle. It’s why they’re so hard to ban. .223 Remington/5.56 NATO is one of the smallest center-fire rifle cartridges that’s commonly available. If you banned every rifle that shot a larger or more powerful round you’d flat-out be banning most rifles, including the one grandpa goes hunting with every year. Since there aren’t many legislators who are willing to try to take away PopPop’s hunting rifle, most bans focus on cosmetic things like pistol grips or adjustable stocks instead of the actual capability of the gun. It all pretty much just comes down to vibes. Regardless of any evidence, people who have little or no firearms experience tend to just sort of assume “assault” rifles still must somehow be deadlier. Otherwise why would soldiers out fighting a war have the one and not the other, right? Plus, for most people, their entire knowledge of firearms comes from Hollywood movies and police procedurals, which means whatever they know about guns that isn’t flat out wrong is probably wildly exaggerated. They’ve spent their whole lives watching guys on their TV with M-16s take down helicopters and blow up trucks just by shooting at them. On some gut level they feel like there must be some truth to it, and it’s very difficult to convince them otherwise when they don’t have any first-hand experience.




  • I don’t think it really matters which models have officially be recalled. No matter how well made that type of brush is, you’re going to have bristles break off eventually. It’s just the nature of that type of tool. I have a couple of friends who are ER nurses, and it seems like every time I see them at a BBQ they’ve got a new story about people accidentally swallowing a metal bristle that broke off one of those. Apparently it happens a lot, so I stopped using them a long time ago. There are so many other safer types of grill brush out there that there really isn’t any reason to. I’ve got one that’s basically a chain mail scrubbing pad on a stick, and another one that’s like a loosely coiled spring that can conform to the shape of my grill and clean the gunk in between the grill slats. If you don’t have anything else, a ball of wadded up aluminum foil does a pretty good job too. The foil does tend to leave a few flakes of aluminum behind, but at least if you accidentally swallow one of those it won’t embed itself in your throat or cut up your digestive tract.