

It’s not worthless anymore even if no human reads it. Other bots pick it up and regurgitate it, as proved by Ars Technica’s article that was itself AI generated.


It’s not worthless anymore even if no human reads it. Other bots pick it up and regurgitate it, as proved by Ars Technica’s article that was itself AI generated.


Who produces the chips that make AMD products? They are the bottleneck. If those fabs are already overloaded, a new product won’t help in any way.


I can’t imagine that they could be worst than the existing VISA and MasterCard duopoly.


You’re right. I meant more by “non-destructive” that it is, depending on factors like intensity and known algorithm, reversible.


A swirl is a distortion that is non-destructive. Am anonymity blur averages out pixels over a wide area in a repetitive manner, which destroys information. Would it be possible to reverse? Maybe a little bit. Maybe one pixel out of every %, but there wouldn’t be any way to prove the accuracy of that pixel and there would be massive gaps in information.


You mean: have it’s neck broken by the falling mass of a shit-mountain of LLM-slop?
The charges were very much because they were looking for any possible reason to put him behind bars for the act of buying that house.