• chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I enjoy Star Wars for specific reasons that I like in entertainment. The ragtag underdog fighting a strong oppressor and winning. The classic fantasy story, but in space. Swords. Small fighters dogfighting more than large ships shooting at each other.

    Now, that’s entertainment, in an action fantasy judgement. Would I want to live in a Star Wars universe over a Star Trek universe? Absolutely not. Do I agree with the moral guidelines of either major side of Star Wars? Again, not really. I definitely don’t like the empire, but even the Jedi are too much of religious fundies to me. I also think the lessons/message of Trek is generally better too.

    It’s a bit like food that’s tasty but not good for you. I enjoy it, but I’m not claiming it’s the better of the two.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    A lot of Star Wars fans are either idolizing the Empire and the Dark Side for their positions of power and control, or the Space Wizards who go out of their way to be naive and get struck down for the better good. If they’re not wearing rebel gear, they’re not default trustworthy.

    If someone watches enough Trek to wear the gear and is open about it, they are at least not against diversity and equality in their fantasy choices.

    • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Also, a lot of normies like Star Wars as a normal action franchise, so there’s some general randomness to the sample. Star Trek pretty specifically appeals to that specific type of nerd, there’s a lot more consistency in the results you can expect.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    21 hours ago

    For me it would depend on what kind of Star Trek shirt it was. If it’s just a shirt that says Star Trek then not really. But if they’re wearing a fucking Starfleet uniform I will trust them with my goddamn life.

  • tio_bira@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 hours ago

    As Star Wars fan and someone who have been following the community for some time, i totally agreed with those people

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    Star Wars is so heavily merchandised that you really can’t tell anything about someone wearing a shirt with Yoda on it, impulse buy at a Wal-Mart. But show me someone wearing a Riker T-Shirt, and I’ll show you someone who went to a convention or decided to order a shirt off of a website. More likely to be one of us harmless earnest dorks who knows who did what at Tenagra.

  • Stonewyvvern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Jokes on all of you…I sport a shirt with Leto the God Emperor of Dune on it.

    For the greater good of humanity, I don’t want to see our extinction. Leto truly was the least selfish person/god to ever grace the Duniverse.

    • Vreyan31@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Finally, a third worst option.

      Star Wars guy might tell you to fuck off, give bad info over confidently, or expect something in return for their help

      But God Emperor guy will lead you to a dark alley to shank you to protect the future gene pool from your weakness, and feel good about it.

  • arcine@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Star Wars is too widely popular for much to be inferred by the shirt, whereas Star Trek fans tend to be more alike : nerdy, generally nice.

  • MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not all Star Trek fans are deep thinkers.

    Not many Star Wars fans are deep thinkers.

    And that’s all I have to say about that.

  • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’d wear a Blake’s 7 shirt if there was an iconic logo that wasn’t also the emblem of the fascist reigime in-universe.

    The bland target logo from Series D doesn’t really appeal to me.

  • negativenull@piefed.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    2 days ago

    I saw this posted before elsewhere (but can’t find it now). In that version, it was stated this was posted in a Star Wars forum, which makes it doubly hilarious if true.

    • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      They better tell me where to find one.

      And if another person tells me Chulak without giving me gate access, their butt is going to have a foothold situation.

      • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Stargate SG-1 is a lot more anarchic than Star Trek ever gets. Most of its episodes are about a group of people that almost always relies on knowledge/expertise rather than rank for decisions, trying to do their best to give societies the tools for their own liberation.

        In Star Trek, it is presented as enlightened that the protagonists will let a genocide happen if its victims are too primitive to have rights (“prime directive”). In Stargate, every injustice is worth fighting against and every person is worthy of fighting it.

        In Star Trek, challenging a captain’s bad decision is misconduct. In Stargate it’s common sense. In Star Trek, slavery gets being reinvented by the good guys because beings aren’t worthy of rights until proven otherwise. In Stargate, slavery requires a revolt.

        The main propaganda of Stargate is that the US would facilitate this behavior, rather than seeking its own imperial supremacy.

        I understand doubting whether people have this interpretation. At least an uncritical watcher of Star Trek will act like a white savior starfleet officer and help until they find some reason to judge you. Uncritical Stargate watchers might actually believe the US military tries to help people structurally and support them.

        Shal’kek nem’ron.

        • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Alternative interpretation: SG-1 team is basically the galaxy class cia, fomenting usa-friendly regime change on every planet they encounter.

          • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Formenting in-group-friendly regime change can be good or bad, depending on what sort of behavior is construed as “-friendly”. Some of my best friends forment in-group-friendly regime change.

            SG-1 destroyed what would have been a very profitable ally because they were space nazis, and they helped space native Americans protect their land against destructive US mining practices.

            Like with any show it’s best to enjoy it critically. I enjoy SG-1 despite it positively depicting a space CIA just like I enjoy TNG despite it positively depicting a space British Royal Navy flagship.

      • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        I get where you’re coming from, but I’d like to draw your attention to this particular exchange from SG-1 S01E16:

        Colonel, the United States is not in the business of interfering in other people’s affairs.

        …Since when?

        They were always a little coy about the propaganda angle.