• toppy@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    The black panther party needs to come back again. USA needs a revolution.

  • duncan_bayne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Historically, angry Marxist-Leninists with guns have been very useful allies in dealing with NAZIs! But history suggests that things didn’t work out too well afterwards, for those ruled by the angry Marxist-Leninists with guns …

  • Cowbee_Admirer@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Reminder to everyone that the hugely successful and wonderful original Black Panther Party were considered “authoritarian” and “violent” by the majority of whites back in the day. The Black Panthers were OG Tankies in every sense of the word, and they were incredibly good as a consequence. From Wikipedia:

    The Black Panther Party (originally the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense) was an American far-leftMarxist–Leninist and black power political organization founded by college students Bobby Seale and Huey P. Newton in October 1966

    Regarding a visit of Huey P. Newton to China:

    During the trip, the Chinese arranged for him to meet and have dinner with an ambassador from North Korea, an ambassador from Tanzania, and delegations from both North Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government of South Vietnam.[44] Newton was under the impression he was going to meet Mao Zedong, chairman of the Chinese Communist Party, but instead had two meetings with Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai. One of these meetings also included Mao’s wife Jiang Qing. Newton described China as “a free and liberated territory with a socialist government”

    THESE are the people that we disregard and insult and call “tankies”!!

  • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you are a black Panther, but an Arch user as well:

    “I feel like we’re welcome,” said one member, also carrying a firearm, who identified himself as Comrade Arch. He said he was a fan of the original group growing up, and he joined a few months ago. “I’ve always had a revolutionary spirit.”

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    cue white liberal tears about how non-violence protests are the only way In 3, 2, 1…

    White liberals love to think that you have one big protest is the effective way. It’s not. It’s a fucking circle jerk protest.

    Non violent protests ONLY work when they are large and sustained. We’re talking daily massive protests that grinds daily living to a halt. If your protest is grinding everything to a halt, you don’t have a protest. You have a strike.

    At that point, it is really only a matter of time before the State attempts to prevent everything by using physical violence on everyone. Armed allies act as a deterrent.

    • Cowbee_Admirer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Agreed! Just to remind everyone, from Wikipedia:

      The Black Panther Party (originally the Black Panther Party for Self-Defense) was an American far-left, Marxist–Leninist and black power political organization

      Marxism-Leninism offers answers to the literal problems we’re living today. Organize and read!!

    • three@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      213
      ·
      7 days ago

      Fuck yeah! More violence! Let the blood run through the streets, may your children grow up without fathers, and your daughters carry your replacement for the front.

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 days ago

        Congrats on getting the most downvotes I think I’ve seen someone get on Lemmy in a long time.

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        93
        ·
        7 days ago

        There is a whole universe of difference between Black Panthers present as an armed deterrent to defend protesters peacefully exercising their First Amendment rights, and agents provocateurs there to start shit and raise hell to light the match for the real violence against all of us to begin.

        Or, to put it more simply, do you see these guys shooting? No. You do not. You see them walking calmly in open carry. That is not violent protest; it is a very strong preventive of violent protest.

        And frankly you sound angrier about that than you do the reason the Black Panthers are there in the first place. Maybe go read something about the Black Panthers, starting with the above article. You might learn something. They are on the side of the community, first and foremost. That may not be your side, but it sure as fuck is mine.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        7 days ago

        They have committed no acts of violence. Arguably they are the most effective deterrent

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        may your children grow up without fathers, and your daughters carry your replacement for the front.

        At the current rate you, your wife and your children will die in a concentration camp or get executed for looking at a fed the wrong way. Better to die resisting than while licking boot.

      • Lydia_K@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’d hate to see them shoot anyone in the face, like some kind of ICE agent, that sure would be terrible. Expect that they don’t. They are defensive, they are heroes, take your rhetoric of imagined violence and shove it up your ass where the real brutalization and murder of innocence lives.

      • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        didn’t realize trying to deter people from committing violence by showing that you can defend yourself was itself committing violence

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Maybe you shouldn’t have voted for this then. Weird how the one not wanting bloodshed is the one perfectly fine with what’s going on.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        We didn’t start the bloodshed, the Republicans are attacking us and we are merely defending our safety.

  • AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    ·
    8 days ago

    Good. I’m willing to bet jackbooted thugs are less likely to shoot someone when there’s a visibly armed protestor nearby.

  • luciferofastora@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    7 days ago

    Remember: Peaceful protests are like barking - annoying, but by itself harmless. It’s the fear of the bite that makes the barking scary.

    You don’t have to jump straight to violence, and I believe that it’s more effective to start with non-violent demands. Once you escalate, there’s nowhere left to go. But the threat of it is what makes the peaceful option less destructive.

    As the saying goes: Nothing will meaningfully change until the rich fear for their lives.

    • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Unions are the peaceful alternative for negotiations that workers and their bosses agreed upon instead of dragging them out of the factory into the street and beating them to death.

      More people need to remember this history.

      Even MLK credited the success of his work during the Civil Rights Movement to the Black Panthers being willing to do what he could not, and the Million Man March on Washington - seen today as an example of successful peaceful protest - was a threat to every white American in a seat of power. If he could mobilize a million people to shut down the capital of the federal government peacefully, imagine what else they could do.

      • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        This is the key point that many do not get. There must be the threat of violence AND the non-violent union/organised resistance option to defeat authoritarian governments. One or the other on its own will not work.

        • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Unfortunately for the US, the rich have spent the decades since the Civil Rights Movement convincing the general populace that their rights were won by holding a snarky sign on a street corner and not by burning down entire city districts after the murder of MLK by the government (which his family proved in court, by the way. Unfortunately, no criminal court would hear the case so it was only in a civil court, but the judge was convinced well enough to find the government guilty).

          Years of protesting and nothing solid was accomplished. Within a week of billions of dollars in damage to property and big business, the Civil Rights laws were drafted, voted on, and signed into law.

    • SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      The only way to tell if your protests are working is if the state is restoring to violence to stop you from continuing to demonstrate.

      The only way protests are ultimately effective is for the beleaguered group to be easier to negotiate with then it is to further supress them with violence.

      The powerful give no ground willingly. It must be taken from them.